State of B2B Websites

B2B Insights Story
Growthlabs have delivered this result many times, and our mission is to make businesses better by connecting them effectively with their audience.We wanted to show what good and bad performance looks like across the B2B sector to help more businesses recognise the importance of this work.
Our benchmarking of website optimisation metrics lets you see where you stand against your peers. And to then take actions to address issues and outperform your competitors.
Research Business Sample
Took part in this research
- Clearly identified as B2B-focused (serving businesses, not consumers)
- English-language primary domain
- Publicly accessible with no major content behind paywalls
- Not recently launched (minimum six months since launch)
- Operated on a CMS or platform with sufficient traffic to be analysed
- Technology Sector - 25.68% (SaaS, IT consultancy firms,Cloud service providers,Data analytics and AI companies,Cybersecurity vendors)
- Manufacturing Sector - 24.94% (Industrial equipment suppliers,OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers),Electronics and component manufacturers
- Business Services Sector - 49.38% (Professional services (legal, accounting, consulting),Marketing and creative agencies,HR, recruitment, and outsourcing providers,Financial and insurance services)

Benchmarks make us better
Generating high value enquiries from the website is often the goal of businesses, but the report highlights why many don’t succeed in that aim. We can see from this report the clear opportunity to use strategic website investment to outperform your competitors."
Performance
General B2B Website Performance
The website performance score in this report is provided by Google's PageSpeed Insights, which measures how well a webpage performs based on various speed and UX metrics. This score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance.
Why should I care?
User Experience
SEO and Rankings
Lead Generation
Mobile Performance
What is a good Google PageSpeed Insights' score?
The PSI score is a core component of this report’s performance assessment, and it plays a critical role in how Google ranks pages in search results—particularly with the introduction of Core Web Vitals as ranking factors.
The PageSpeed Insights tool assigns a numeric score between 0 and 100, divided into three colour-coded categories:
Score Range | Category | Meaning |
---|---|---|
90–100 | ✅ Good | The website performs well and meets most of Google’s performance standards. |
50–89 | ⚠️ Needs Improvement | The site has moderate issues that negatively impact user experience. |
0–49 | ❌ Poor | Serious performance issues are present; major improvements are needed. |
Average B2B Website Performance
This combined score of both desktop and mobile website performance provides a holistic view of how well B2B websites are performing in terms of speed, usability, and technical optimisation.
Our research found that the average B2B Website performance score is 65.9 out of 100.
This score places the typical B2B website firmly within the “Needs Improvement” category, according to Google’s PageSpeed Insights grading criteria. The average score of 65.9 indicates that most B2B websites are not currently delivering a high-performing experience. While not critically poor, they fall short of Google’s preferred standards, which can hinder:
Organic search rankings
Mobile user engagement
Bounce rates and conversion success
Google’s algorithm rewards fast, well-optimised websites. A score below 90 can contribute to lower SERP visibility, especially for mobile-first indexing.
Considering only 3.7% of B2B websites managed to get this right, there is a considerable opportunity to differentiate B2B websites from their competitors.
Desktop vs Mobile Websites
One of the most revealing insights from the Growthlabs audit is the substantial disparity in website performance between desktop and mobile platforms across the B2B sector. Although desktop devices remain prevalent in professional environments, mobile usage now accounts for approximately 35–45% of B2B web traffic—a figure that continues to grow.
Despite this shift, our findings indicate that B2B websites remain significantly under-optimised for mobile users.
The following are the averages for both platforms:
- Desktop Average – 75.1
- Mobile Average – 57.1
While both platforms fall into Google’s “Needs Improvement” category, mobile performance lags 18 points behind desktop on average, representing a serious underinvestment in mobile optimisation across the B2B digital landscape.
What is more concerning is that only 3% of B2B mobile websites manage to obtain a good score.
Mobile - The Downfall of B2B Website Performance
It is clear that B2B websites are not well-optimised and have lower performance on mobile devices than on desktops. Although consumer-focused websites have higher mobile usage, B2B websites still get around 35%-45% of traffic from these devices. Underperformance on mobile is likely to have the following impact:
Lower Search Rankings: Google utilises mobile-first indexing, so poor mobile scores can negatively impact your overall visibility, even for desktop searches.
Reduced Engagement: Mobile users encountering slow, broken, or cluttered experiences are more likely to bounce without converting.
Brand Perception: A slow, non-optimised mobile site can signal inefficiency and outdated practices.
Missed Opportunities: Decision-makers increasingly use mobile devices outside standard work hours. A poor mobile site means lost leads.
High Waiting Times
One of the most overlooked, yet critically important, aspects of website performance is server response latency, often referred to as waiting time. This metric measures the delay between a user’s request for a webpage and the first byte of data being received from the server—a factor known as Time to First Byte (TTFB).
In the context of B2B websites, where users expect fast and seamless interactions, high waiting times directly contribute to slower page loads, poor user experience, and reduced search engine rankings.
Our analysis revealed the following:
The average number of high waiting time pages per B2B website: 17
Percentage of websites with high waiting time pages: 37%
This indicates that over one-third of B2B websites contain multiple pages with excessive server delays, often affecting key landing pages, resource hubs, or conversion points.
Causes of High Waiting Times
The underlying causes of high waiting times are often technical and infrastructure-related. Common issues include:
Slow or overloaded hosting servers: Shared or under-resourced servers delay response times under heavy traffic loads.
Lack of caching: Each request is processed from scratch instead of being served from a cache.
Unoptimised database queries: Dynamic content generation leads to server-side delays.
Overuse of plugins or third-party scripts: Increases server processing time before responding to the browser.
Geographic distance from server: Users far from the host server may experience slower connections without a CDN (Content Delivery Network).
High Loading Time
While waiting time measures how fast a server responds, loading time captures the total duration a webpage takes to fully load and become interactive for the user. In the competitive B2B landscape, where trust, speed, and convenience are essential, high loading times can directly undermine lead generation and sales effectiveness.
Google defines a high loading time as any page that takes more than 4 seconds to fully render. From the user’s perspective, this delay feels sluggish and frustrating, often resulting in site abandonment before meaningful engagement can even begin.
Our research across the B2B sector uncovered a significant issue:
- The average number of high-loading time pages per website: 18
- Percentage of B2B websites with high loading time pages: 40%
This means nearly half of the audited websites have substantial delays in delivering content—many on key user entry points like homepages, service pages, and resource centres.
Why High Loading Time Matters
Loading time is a core part of Google’s Page Experience signal and is strongly correlated with both user satisfaction and conversion performance. Pages that exceed the 4-second mark are more likely to suffer from:
Increased bounce rates: Users are likely to abandon pages that load too slowly.
Reduced search visibility: Google penalises pages with poor load performance.
Lower user engagement: Visitors are less likely to scroll, click, or complete forms.
Wasted ad spend: Paid campaigns pointing to slow pages can drive up cost-per-click without returns.
Amazon found that every 100ms increase in load time cost them 1% in sales—a trend that translates proportionally across B2B sites where lead capture is the primary goal.
Causes of High Loading Time
The underlying causes of high loading commonly issues include:
Uncompressed high-resolution images: Slows visual rendering dramatically.
Too many third-party scripts: Adds processing burden (e.g., chatbots, analytics, trackers).
Poor hosting infrastructure: Increases server response time and delays page rendering.
Bloated CSS and JavaScript files: Delays time to interactivity.
Lack of lazy loading or deferred scripts: Causes full-page resources to load before visible content appears.
B2B Website Builders: Platform Trends
The choice of content management system (CMS) or website builder has a significant impact on the performance, scalability, and SEO readiness of a B2B website. Different platforms offer varying degrees of flexibility, technical control, and optimisation potential—factors that directly influence both user experience and digital visibility.
As part of our audit, we analysed the CMS and web builder platforms used by B2B companies across our sample. The findings reveal clear trends in platform adoption, as well as distinct performance strengths and limitations associated with each.
WordPress stands out as the dominant choice, powering nearly half of all audited B2B websites. Its popularity is largely due to its open-source nature, massive plugin ecosystem, and ability to scale when configured correctly.
SEO
B2B Search Engine Optimisation Performance
Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) remains one of the most critical components of a successful B2B digital strategy. Unlike paid media, SEO compounds over time, delivering sustainable visibility, high-quality inbound traffic, and long-term ROI. However, our audit revealed that a significant majority of B2B websites are failing to implement core SEO best practices, limiting their ability to compete in organic search.
This section examines the overall state of B2B SEO, with a focus on domain authority, structural optimisation, and common errors that are holding businesses back.

SEO Performance - Domain Rating (DR)
A Domain Rating (DR) is a metric developed by Ahrefs to measure the strength of a website’s backlink profile. This metric is widely used in SEO to evaluate link-building opportunities and estimate a website’s authority and potential to rank well in search engine results.
DR is a logarithmic scale from 0 to 100. Meaning it becomes increasingly difficult to improve your DR as your increases. Only major authoritative websites have high scores, such as Facebook (DR 100), Google (DR 98), the BBC (DR 93), and Wikipedia (DR 91).
High domain authority is especially crucial for B2B companies competing for high-intent, low-volume keywords, where trust signals and backlink strength significantly influence rankings.
Why should I care?
Improved Search Rankings
Increased Organic Traffic
Improved Authority
Higher Conversion Rates
B2B DR Benchmark - What is a good DR?
The Domain Authority (DA) scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating stronger backlink profiles and a higher perceived trustworthiness by search engines. Below is a general rule of thumb:
- 0–20: Weak authority, often new or unlinked sites
- 20–50: Moderate authority, typically small to mid-sized businesses
- 50–70: Strong authority, often with national presence or content depth
- 70–100: Very high authority, usually industry leaders or major publications
The UK B2B Domain Rating paints a bleak picture: most B2B websites have weak backlink profiles, which limits their ability to compete for high-value search terms.
- 20th percentile (DR 3.6):
- 40th percentile (DR 10):
- 60th percentile (DR 22):
- 80th percentile (DR 31):
- Highest recorded (DR 77):
- Lowest recorded (DR 0.4):
- Median (DR 16):
- Average (DR 20):
Implications for B2B Businesses
- Most B2B websites have underdeveloped backlink profiles. The median DR of 16 indicates that half of the audited websites have minimal authority, which severely limits their organic search competitiveness.
- More than 50% of B2B’s DR is below 20, indicating SEO competition for backlinks is low within the industry. This indicates a substantial opportunity.
- There is a steep climb in value from DR 20 to DR 31. Because DR is a logarithmic metric, each incremental improvement becomes more difficult. Moving from DR 10 to 20 is relatively achievable; however, increasing from 20 to 13 and above requires significantly more effort and higher-quality backlinks. Only 20% of B2B’s have achieved this.
- High performers stand out dramatically. Websites with DR scores above 50 are in a much stronger position to rank for high-volume, competitive keywords and are likely seen as leaders within their niche.
- DR within the DR 22 to 10 is likely to only rank for brand name searches or low-competition terms. It will struggle to generate meaningful organic traffic without an SEO and link-building strategy.
- A DR in the 22–31 range is a positive sign of momentum. These companies are likely to outperform 60% of their competitors. However, continued link acquisition and content creation are essential to improve competitive positioning.
- A DR above 40 suggests the business has a solid content strategy a strong online presence, and is actively building credibility across third-party sites—a significant advantage in B2B lead generation.
Recommendations Based on Your DR Score
If your DR is under 22: Focus on building foundational links. Start with directories, local citations, guest posts, and partnerships with clients or suppliers.
If your DR is 22–30: Accelerate your content marketing and begin targeting industry-specific publications for backlinks.
If your DR is above 30: Leverage your authority by targeting competitive, commercial-intent keywords and investing in thought leadership to further widen your gap over competitors.
Common B2B SEO Mistakes - Pages With No H1 Tags
One of the most fundamental, yet frequently overlooked, elements of on-page SEO is the proper use of H1 tags, the primary heading element in HTML that indicates the main topic of a webpage. Despite its simplicity, incorrect or missing H1 tags remain a widespread issue across B2B websites, with direct consequences for both search engine rankings and user experience.
Pages without H1 tags are missing a critical opportunity to communicate content focus to search engines. This can result in:
Lower keyword relevance: Google may struggle to associate the page with search intent.
Reduced accessibility: Users with assistive technologies may have difficulty understanding the content hierarchy.
Weakened content structure: A lack of clear headings can make pages appear disorganised or unprofessional.
In competitive B2B industries, even small technical oversights can make the difference between ranking on page 1 or being buried on page 4.
Our audit uncovered a systemic issue in B2B web development practices:
- Only 41% of websites followed the best practice of using a single H1 tag per page.
- The average B2B website had 10 pages without any H1 tag at all.
These omissions occur most frequently on:
- Using multiple
- tags instead of proper heading tags break the semantic structure of the page.
- Relying on visual formatting (like bold text) misleads users and search engines, as it’s not machine-readable.
- Template errors in CMS platforms can cause a uniform absence of H1 tags across pages if not configured correctly.
- Overusing multiple H1 tags per page confuses search engines about the page’s main intent.
- Neglect during content migration leads to structural inconsistencies across newly imported pages.
Common B2B SEO Mistakes - H1 Title Length
While most SEO discussions focus on the presence of H1 tags, few address another critical factor: the length of H1 titles. In B2B SEO, it’s not only important to use a heading—it’s equally vital to ensure it is appropriately sized for search engines and users alike.
An H1 that is too short can be vague or uninformative, while an overly long H1 can dilute keyword relevance and harm user readability. Both issues reduce the effectiveness of one of the most valuable on-page SEO elements.
Its H1 title length influences:
- Relevance and keyword targeting: A clear, well-crafted H1 helps Google understand what the page is about and which queries it should rank for.
- User engagement: Visitors quickly scan H1s to assess whether a page is worth reading. Unclear or overwhelming headings reduce clarity.
- Consistency with SEO title tags and SERP expectations: A poorly structured H1 can clash with the meta title or result in mixed messaging in search snippets.
Our Research Findings
Our audit revealed that H1 length mismanagement is widespread in the B2B space:
- 67% of websites have H1 tags that are too long, potentially diluting clarity and SEO effectiveness.
- 77% of websites have H1 tags that are too short, possibly lacking context or keyword relevance.
- On average, websites have 15 pages with overly long H1 tags.
- On average, websites have 14 pages with overly short H1 tags.
Optimal H1 Length: Best Practices
The ideal H1 title length for SEO and usability is:
- Between 20 and 70 characters
- Including a clear focus keyword
- Avoiding keyword stuffing or unnatural phrasing
- Reflecting the user intent behind the target search query
This balance ensures the H1 is descriptive enough to satisfy both users and search engines without appearing cluttered or truncated in visual layouts.
Images With No Titles
Titles can provide additional context when users hover over images, enhancing their understanding and interaction with the content.
A whopping 98.3% of B2B websites contain images without titles.
On average, 56 images on B2B websites do not include image titles.
Images With No Alt Tags
Alt tags help visually impaired users understand images through screen readers. Additionally, Search engines use alt tags to understand the content of images. Thus, impacting your search rankings.
An essential oversight is that 89.2% of B2B websites contain images without alt tags.
On average, each B2B website has 43 images without alt tags.
Common SEO Mistakes - Lack of Sightmaps
A surprisingly common technical SEO oversight among B2B websites is the absence of an XML sitemap. While seemingly minor, failing to implement and submit a sitemap can have serious consequences for a website’s search visibility and content discoverability—particularly for larger or more complex sites.
A sitemap is an XML file that lists all the important URLs on your website, helping search engines like Google and Bing understand the structure of your site and efficiently crawl its content.
Key Functions of a Sitemap:
- Improves crawl coverage by flagging new or updated pages
- Ensures discoverability of deeper, less-linked pages (e.g., blog posts, gated resources)
- Assists in indexing content on large, dynamic, or e-commerce websites
- Signals content importance through priority settings and update frequency
Our analysis revealed a significant gap in sitemap implementation across the audited sample:
- 81% of B2B websites had a sitemap successfully submitted to Google, aiding in better indexing and crawlability.
- 19% of B2B websites lacked a sitemap entirely—no XML file was available or registered in Google Search Console.
Common Causes of Missing or Ineffective Sitemaps
- CMS misconfiguration: Some platforms don’t auto-generate or submit sitemaps unless plugins are installed or settings are manually adjusted.
- Overlooking technical SEO during development: Sitemaps are often omitted when SEO considerations are not integrated into the design and development process.
- Fragmented URL structure or page sprawl: This can lead to incomplete or outdated sitemaps that don’t reflect the full site architecture.
- Poor webmaster practices: Sitemaps may not be submitted to tools like Google Search Console or Bing Webmaster Tools, limiting visibility.
- Legacy content not included: Older or archived pages may be unintentionally excluded from the sitemap, reducing their discoverability.
Common SEO Mistakes - No Meta Description
Meta descriptions are a foundational element of on-page SEO, yet they are frequently underused or entirely omitted across B2B websites. While meta descriptions do not directly influence search engine rankings, they play a critical role in influencing click-through rates (CTR) by acting as the descriptive preview shown in search engine results.
Our audit revealed a widespread lack of properly implemented meta descriptions, which limits organic performance, user engagement, and overall search visibility.
What Is a Meta Description and Why It Matters
- A meta description is an HTML attribute that provides a brief summary of a webpage’s content. It appears in search engine results pages (SERPs) beneath the page title and URL.
- Why meta descriptions are important:
- Improve CTR in search results by giving users a compelling reason to click.
- Reinforce keyword relevance when search terms are highlighted in bold.
- Influence perception of brand professionalism and content quality.
- Aid accessibility and screen reader interpretation.
Audit Findings: Meta Description Usage in B2B Websites
Our audit uncovered the following:
76% of B2B websites have pages with missing meta descriptions
On average, each affected website has dozens of pages lacking custom or optimised summaries
These omissions most commonly occur on:
Blog articles
Product or service pages
Resource libraries (e.g., case studies, whitepapers)
Landing pages generated via templated CMS workflows
In many cases, these pages are left to rely on automatically generated snippets—often pulled arbitrarily by Google, with unpredictable or suboptimal content.
Conclusion
This report highlights a stark but actionable reality: the vast majority of B2B websites are underperforming across critical areas of web performance and search engine optimisation. From sluggish page speeds and high waiting times to overlooked SEO fundamentals like missing H1 tags, broken links, and absent meta descriptions, the findings point to a sector-wide opportunity for strategic improvement.
Despite the widespread challenges identified, the implications are not discouraging—they are empowering. For businesses willing to prioritise digital optimisation, there is a clear and immediate competitive advantage to be gained. With more than 96% of B2B websites falling into the “Needs Improvement” or “Poor” categories on Google PageSpeed Insights, even incremental improvements in performance and SEO can result in outsized returns.
The Path Forward
At Growthlabs, we help B2B businesses execute these improvements with precision, combining performance-focused development with best-in-class SEO strategy. Whether you’re just starting to optimise or are looking to scale, our team is ready to guide you through every step of your digital growth journey.